336. A Child Torn in Two: and Justice is Blind

No Court of Law has the right to punish a defenceless minor

The question that comes to mind when a child with two learned, educated parents, a lawyer as a father and a chemist as a mother, was dragged through the street, scraping the pavement, shoved in a car and taken “into care”? Naturally at the expense of us tax payers!

Which goes to prove that education does not always lead to civilization, because when the bickering starts the war begins with a tragic outcome which makes Danny de Vito’s “War of the Roses” a realistic comparison.

Of course each parent will have mountains to say in his or her defence but at the end of the day, as far as I can understand the problem which for years has revolved around this case is the mother has not made it easy for the father to see Johnny (not real name), the child, and the father demanded to see the child. However, judging by how the father makes his demands effective is a clear indication that he must be one of the nicest, easy-to-get-along-with guys on the planet.

Life has no remedy for the hate that replaces love, when this ends. It is also totally useless to mention such things as “goodness”, “God”, “friendship”, “the good of the child”, because when selfishness sets in, all these words are simply water off a duck’s back.

The only way such people come to understand the phrases I have mentioned above is by being chastised and the judge in Venice responsible for the court order that the child be assigned to the father, instead of punishing Johnny by shoving him here there and everywhere, so to speak, should have made a court order against the mother for breaking the rules, and now against the father for cruelty against minors.

All nature cries out, when separation occurs, a child should live with the mother- a judge should know that. I’m emphasizing on this because there is also a similar case in the news in the Venetian area where a court order was made in favour of the father and the child, again at the taxpayer’s expense, placed into a foster home, when there are two parents quite capable of taking care of that child. True, the child has a right to see the father- and this is where mothers are so blatantly stupid about the situation- but a judge should not be punishing the child by depriving him/her of their mother, home, school and everything else!

There are cases when it is the child who does not want to go and see the father, in that case the father should go to the home and see the child. If the mother does not allow it then the mother should be apprehended and put behind bars for a month or two to cool off, but it should never be the child that has to be shoved around, because in doing so you are punishing the child in all effects.

Should the father ill-treat the child as it is evident in the bad man-handling of Johnny seen in the video posted in my last blog and according to the maternal aunt, the child claims to have been ill-treated by the father therefore does not want to go with him, then it is the man that should be put behind bars for a month or two to cool off- not the child- because by depriving Johnny of his home, his school which he loves, his friends and all things familiar and loved by him, is in effect condemning him to a sentence which is no different to that of being in prison. Any court of law in their right mind should be able to see that.

Punishing the child is vile, cowardly and wicked by any court of law, this is not justice. If parents break the rules, it is wicked for a judge to be on the side of this or that parent, and condemning the child for his/her parents’ ill-doing... of course all at the tax payer’s expense, and I for one, strongly object my money being used by a court of law for condemning children.

Related Articles

325 Scenes that shocked Italians