300. Berlusconi and the Justice System




I am continuing a series of blogs on Silvio Berlusconi in answer to tweets sent to me by Twitter @gibrayl International relations and diplomatic affairs (Middle East, US, Africa, Latin America, Europe) - International Communication and Cultural Studies- https://twitter.com/#!/gibrayl 

Tweet No. 2
2) He has never been discharged but he has always worked with his lawyers and through laws "ad personam" to get the prescription.

My Answer 

Berlusconi has been prosecuted by some of the Milanese Magistrates for accusations that number in their hundreds which makes one wonder, either Berlusconi is the greatest criminal of all times or he is well and truly persecuted with the aim of eliminating him from political power.

Another point worth noting is that I would very much like someone to come up with at least one of the laws Berlusconi has created which can be described to be “ad personam”- in other words, a law, legitimately passed by parliament that can be identified to be a law simply created to save his skin.

If  by chance one of the hundreds of Berlusconi’s cases cannot be tried because it has fallen into prescription, this is certainly not Berlusconi’s fault but of the system which takes 13-20 years, if not longer to judge a civil case, even if it is slightly less for a penal one- and indeed may take a mere 6 years if the foreign press is involved as in the case of Amanda Knox. 

With such conditions is it any wonder that the Berlusconi government tried to reform the justice system?  But the reforms made can hardly be described as “ad personam”.

The Reforms

1.  Il Processo Breve- (The Brief Trial)

This law establishes that trials are subject to “a reasonable length of time” otherwise the trial will be extinct if a first sentence is not reached within three years.  I can well remember, in the US and the UK that murderers have been tried and sentenced to death or life imprisonment within a few months.  In effect hearings abroad are fixed for the next day or even that same afternoon. A hearing in the afternoon is a thing unheard of in Italy.  In Italy hearings are months apart from one another... I often wondered why, and the most plausible explanation is that no one in a court of law can do shorthand, use modern technical equipment and the photo copier is often out of order- yes, hearings have been put off for much less.  And this is claimed to be a law to favour just Berlusconi and one should return to the eternal stagnation of the previous interminable lengths of the Judicial System with thousands of prisoners in overcrowded jails waiting for a sentence???

2.  Separation of Functions

In Britain, it is the police that arrests, investigate and brings to trial an individual.  This function was done by the Pubblico Ministero i.e. Public Prosecutor, who however was also the Judge.  No, I haven’t got myself muddled up, that’s how it was until the Berlusconi government came up with the separation of functions, in other words a Public Prosecutor could not also be the Judge.  If this is a law created ad personam, I can well imagine why Berlusconi created it, if he was going to be judged by the same judge who prosecuted him, fat chance did he have of a fair trial- fat chance anyone had for that matter. Italians can only be but grateful for this reform.

3.  Civil Responsibility of Judges

Up until a week or two ago, judges were above the law, they could do no wrong.  If they made a mistake or gave a wrong sentence, they were not held responsible for their decision in any way whatsoever.  Berlusconi tried to pass a law against this, but because of the powers that be, he was not allowed to do so.  Italians had to wait until the new Prime Minister, Mario Monti came to govern before this legislation was allowed to become law.  However, there was a great deal of uproar and discontent among the magistrates, threatening that with such a law no judge would ever come to a decision in case he made an error!!! Someone set fire to the lot of them, please!

4.  Phone Tapping Curtailed

This law restricts phone tapping to serious cases, not as it was until recently when every Tom, Dick and Harry were all subject to being bugged, even if they had nothing to do with crime or criminals.  The proof of this is a report by Eurispes that shows the astronomical figures of phone tapping done. In the year 2007 alone 112,623 phones were under tapping surveillance for a sum of  €224.000.000,00.  The numbers have since increased. The Justice system shows to be in arrears with phone surveillance agencies for the sum of 400 million of  Euros.  Is it any wonder Italy is in such great debt... How much does your government spend on phone tapping, hardly 1/20th I shouldn’t wonder. 

Of course a law such as this is ad personam... about time too-  however, what the hell does a Magistrate in Milan do with the noises he hears in Berlusconi’s toilet chamber???

Related Articles:


Popular Posts