167. 6th Century Church: Orange or Pomegranate?
Not Only Words, but Images Can be a Cause for Misunderstanding
|
You would think that murals in churches were painted to give enlightenment and instructions to those who cast their eyes upon them, this normally is the case and each era had its own code of meanings and symbpls which the people of that epoch were capable of understanding. Authorities, obviously, took it for granted that the images depicted would be translated in the manner they were expected to be.
But it wasn’t a pomegranate! Remo Serafin, the Architect who restored the church claims. It was an orange. As in those days people were not familiar with oranges they interpreted the fruit as a pomegranate. It was the natural choice, the architect explained since not only was the pomegranate well known as far back as the bronze age but it was often used as the symbol of the fullness of Jesus’ suffering and resurrection in Christianity. Furthermore, Sandro Botticelli painted the renown “Madonna of the Pomegranate” round about 1487 and of course, any artist would have known that.
| Photo: Close-up of the fruit of discord |
So why didn’t the artist make it clear it was a pomegranate instead of a dubious orange- I asked. The architect said there was no doubt at all it was an orange, not with the wide crenulated leaves as opposed to the narrow smooth edge of those of a pomegranate- beside that fruit had no crown. Obviously, artists had their own streak of eccentricity and maybe this one was no exception- taking people for a ride by painting an orange and passing it off for a pomegranate, I said.
| The inauguration Mass celebrated 13th December 2008- Feast of Saint Lucy |
